Re: psql \watch versus \timing

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql \watch versus \timing
Date: 2014-09-04 13:50:58
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRZ-rSn1=YjGw0i+p0++cN_zaM-VKeFSVODJO=ksJXwPw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Good catch. So I will remove start_xact code later.
> Attached patch removes start_xact from PSQLexec.
Nothing negative to say here :)
Patch simply removes the second argument of PSQLexec that was set to
the same value everywhere, aka false as noticed by Heikki. Comments
and code blocks related to this parameter are removed, and the code
compiles, passing check-world as well (just kicked the tests in case).
Regards,
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-09-04 13:53:21 Re: Escaping from blocked send() reprised.
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-09-04 13:43:34 Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2