From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomáš Uko <uko(at)avast(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lock contention in TransactionIdIsInProgress() |
Date: | 2016-10-08 12:23:41 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRXkX5yW3C8q6bX5L3hzJtWWiLFko-EOHxYP0d5hXkcKA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Tomáš Uko <uko(at)avast(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>>
>>
>> We have encountered same problem as you (in 9.5.4), it seems that so far it
>> hasn’t been ported back from 9.6, but if you take this commit and apply it
>> to 9.5 source codes, it seems to be working
>>
>> But anyway, does anybody knows plans about backporting this to 9.5 official
>> way?
>
> Won't happen. Only bugs get ported back, and performance enhancements
> generally don't qualify (in very exceptional cases they might but this
> issue is a routine performance enhancement). Basically you have to
> decide to update or stay with 9.5.
Another possibility is to patch and build yourself Postgres if you are
still willing to use that with a given version. But as that's actually
forking the upstream version, it won't be supported by community.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan de Visser | 2016-10-08 14:11:53 | Re: import_bytea function |
Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2016-10-08 06:46:24 | Re: import_bytea function |