Re: Duplicate patch in commitfest

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Duplicate patch in commitfest
Date: 2015-11-27 22:37:59
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRWSWze0OHQgWeoD1KECj7bFjajz+UvnvBndPZg_eurtw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There are two commitfest entries which are linked to the same patch/thread
>
> Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/7/370/
> and
> Replace buffer manager spinlock with atomic operations
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/7/408/
>
> Suppose, one of them could be rejected.

I can delete the newest entry if people are fine with that. That will
make the history cleaner.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-11-27 22:53:10 Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-11-27 22:33:31 Re: Errors in our encoding conversion tables