Re: patch proposal

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch proposal
Date: 2017-01-24 03:52:10
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRVCH95MQ8dQgCrRzQmwiX=dKDKyKYYVW=hj7YMM6r=wA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:22 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> 3) There are no tests. I believe that
> src/test/recovery/t/006_logical_decoding.pl would be the best place to
> insert your tests.

003_recovery_targets.pl is the test for recovery targets. The routines
it has would be helpful.

> I'm marking this as "Waiting on Author", but honestly I think "Returned
> with Feedback" might be more appropriate. I'll leave that up to the CFM.

We could wait a couple of days before that, this patch just got a
review. (Thanks!)
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2017-01-24 03:59:44 Re: src/test/README for logical replication
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-01-24 03:49:42 Re: Checksums by default?