Re: Writing new unit tests with PostgresNode

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Craig Ringer wrote:
>
>> > +=pod
>> > +
>> > +=head2 Set up a node
>> > pod format... Do we really want that? Considering that those modules
>> > are only aimed at being dedicated for in-core testing, I would say no.
>>
>> If it's plain comments you have to scan through massive piles of verbose
>> Perl to find what you want. If it's pod you can just perldoc
>> /path/to/module it and get a nice summary of the functions etc.
>>
>> If these are intended to become usable facilities for people to write tests
>> with then I think it's important that the docs be reasonably accessible.
>
> Yes, I think adding POD here is a good idea. I considered doing it
> myself back when I was messing with PostgresNode ...

OK, withdrawal from here. If there are patches to add that to the
existing tests, I'll review them, and rebase what I have depending on
what gets in first. Could a proper patch split be done please?
--
Michael