From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ali Akbar <the(dot)apaan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Function array_agg(array) |
Date: | 2014-10-24 11:46:19 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRJVsiG0PjUo8mDRf6WfpbhyA90FBEXeyNFzP=4CpkBfQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Ali Akbar <the(dot)apaan(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 2014-10-24 16:26 GMT+07:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> some in last patch is wrong, I cannot to compile it:
>>
>> arrayfuncs.c: In function 'accumArrayResult':
>> arrayfuncs.c:4603:9: error: 'ArrayBuildState' has no member named 'alen'
>> astate->alen = 64; /* arbitrary starting array size */
>> ^
>> arrayfuncs.c:4604:9: error: 'ArrayBuildState' has no member named
>> 'dvalues'
>> astate->dvalues = (Datum *) palloc(astate->alen * sizeof(Datum));
>> ^
>> arrayfuncs.c:4604:44: error: 'ArrayBuildState' has no member named 'alen'
>> astate->dvalues = (Datum *) palloc(astate->alen * sizeof(Datum));
>> ^
>> arrayfuncs.c:4605:9: error: 'ArrayBuildState' has no member named 'dnulls'
>> astate->dnulls = (bool *) palloc(astate->alen * sizeof(bool));
>> ^
>> arrayfuncs.c:4605:42: error: 'ArrayBuildState' has no member named 'alen'
>> astate->dnulls = (bool *) palloc(astate->alen * sizeof(bool));
>> ^
>> arrayfuncs.c:4606:9: error: 'ArrayBuildState' has no member named 'nelems'
>> astate->nelems = 0;
>> ^
>> arrayfuncs.c:4618:13: error: 'ArrayBuildState' has no member named
>> 'nelems'
>> if (astate->nelems >= astate->alen)
>> ^
>> arrayfuncs.c:4618:31: error: 'ArrayBuildState' has no member named 'alen'
>> if (astate->nelems >= astate->alen)
>> ^
>> arrayfuncs.c:4620:10: error: 'ArrayBuildState' has no member named 'alen'
>> astate->alen *= 2;
>>
>
> Sorry, correct patch attached.
>
> This patch is in patience format (git --patience ..). In previous patches,
> i use context format (git --patience ... | filterdiff --format=context),
> but it turns out that some modification is lost.
>
That's not surprising, sometimes filterdiff misses the shot.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian Pflug | 2014-10-24 11:53:47 | Re: Question about RI checks |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-10-24 10:35:03 | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition - v0.2 |