From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
Date: | 2013-11-18 10:52:29 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRGeFS1Z5dTgs77jBmJPYx02FdK7pNFCMGHmqvXxaH49w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2013-11-15 11:40:17 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> - 20131114_3_reindex_concurrently.patch, providing the core feature.
>> Patch 3 needs to have patch 2 applied first. Regression tests,
>> isolation tests and documentation are included with the patch.
>
> Have you addressed my concurrency concerns from the last version?
I have added documentation in the patch with a better explanation
about why those choices of implementation are made.
Thanks,
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
20131119_0_reindex_base.patch | text/x-patch | 6.6 KB |
20131119_1_reindex_conc.patch | text/x-patch | 71.1 KB |
20131119_index_drop_comments.patch | text/x-patch | 1.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Haribabu kommi | 2013-11-18 11:16:36 | Re: Improvement of pg_stat_statement usage about buffer hit ratio |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-11-18 10:50:21 | Re: Sequence Access Method WIP |