Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
Date: 2017-02-01 04:09:51
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRFhUv+GX=eH1bo7xYHS79-gRj1ecu2QoQtHvX9RS=JYA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Six new syscaches in 665d1fa was conflicted and 3-way merge
> worked correctly. The new syscaches don't seem to be targets of
> this patch.

To be honest, I am not completely sure what to think about this patch.
Moved to next CF as there is a new version, and no new reviews to make
the discussion perhaps move on.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-01 04:11:38 Re: Supporting huge pages on Windows
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-01 04:08:07 Re: pageinspect: Hash index support