Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2016-04-06 09:18:08
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRFWoUo8Fwe80gVTsNfTfNW0d2ETZ5wdB3VQkqk+EzGZg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Okay, I pushed the patch!
> Many thanks to all involved in the development of this feature!

I think that I am crying... Really cool to see this milestone accomplished.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2016-04-06 09:26:20 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-04-06 09:09:05 Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Avoid archiving XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS on idle server