Re: Event trigger and CREATE/ALTER ROLE/USER

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Event trigger and CREATE/ALTER ROLE/USER
Date: 2016-09-18 11:44:29
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRC3ePmBryJ5dvShVLiu5vVWRQQ_TxP23XGodum=y6u1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> As I understand the issue, the main reason is that event triggers
>> execute procedures, and those exist in a single database only. If you
>> were to create an event trigger in database A, then a user gets created
>> in database B, your function would not be invoked, which becomes a
>> problem.
>
> Can't we just create the event trigger in database B as well? We have
> been living with similar situation, for example, functions for years.
> (a work around would be creating functions in template1. This only
> works for freshly created database though).

Just a random thought: wouldn't what you are looking for be more
reliable if you use the utility hook and have it loaded via
preload_shared_libraries?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2016-09-18 13:21:23 Re: Fix for PL/Python slow input arrays traversal issue
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2016-09-18 11:14:51 Re: ecpg -? option doesn't work in windows