Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan
Date: 2017-11-30 03:12:26
Message-ID: CAB7nPqR9TS7kwKgGbJU7=YJKPoZiZfq-WfGToMc5yTpUx88M0Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It is hard to create regress tests. Any ideas?

Moving to next CF per lack of reviews.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 03:14:10 Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-11-30 03:08:09 Re: [HACKERS] <> join selectivity estimate question