Re: dividing privileges for replication role.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomonari Katsumata <t(dot)katsumata1122(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dividing privileges for replication role.
Date: 2013-01-23 08:56:59
Message-ID: CAB7nPqR7eWmuy3Xxq_UcgkU2jn5Sidi6ZRquhSqop9SkcgQcxA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Tomonari Katsumata <
t(dot)katsumata1122(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> ex:
>
> primary_conninfo = 'port=5432 standby_mode=master-cascade'
> primary_conninfo = 'port=5432 standby_mode=master-only'
> primary_conninfo = 'port=5432 standby_mode=cascade-only'
>
> I think it will be able to do same control with privilege controlling.
> And it won't be contrary to the policy(no data is stored in system
> catalogs).
>
> Because it is corner-case, I should not do anything about this?
> (Am I concerning too much?)
>
Just curious, but... What is your primary goal with this patch?
Solving the cyclic problem?
--
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2013-01-23 09:03:04 Re: .gitignore additions
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-01-23 08:47:47 Re: .gitignore additions