From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Incorrect processing of CREATE TRANSFORM with DDL deparding |
Date: | 2015-05-25 21:47:54 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqR3oeggsoVqKrgvoS=mJCfH1qMbFHjCGj2RVLu0Nf7Sjg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> In ProcessUtilitySlow()@utility.c, for a node T_CreateTransformStmt,
>> process does not return ObjectAddress. This makes process inconsistent
>> with the other commands and the ObjectAddress passed to
>> EventTriggerCollectSimpleCommand is not initialized.
>> Coverity has pointed out the error, I just some legwork to sort out a fix.
>
> Yeah, I had noticed this and was pretty annoyed because we ended up in
> precisely the situation we didn't want to be: new code is added to
> ProcessUtility that is not handled by the deparse framework. (I
> don't know whether TRANSFORM went in first or deparse, but it doesn't
> really matter.)
>
> The fix as you say is pretty trivial, but I would like to use this is a
> test case to ensure that we will catch all these mistakes in the future
> too not only this particular one.
I guess that you could add an assertion at the bottom of
ProcessUtilitySlow() as well to check code paths where ObjectAddress
is not initialized correctly.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Venkata Balaji N | 2015-05-26 01:49:34 | Re: BUG #13307: Increasing space |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-25 21:18:16 | Re: [CORE] [BUGS] BUG #13350: blindly fsyncing data dir considered harmful |