Re: recovery_min_apply_delay with a negative value

On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> While reviewing another patch, I have noticed that
>> recovery_min_apply_delay can have a negative value. And the funny part is
>> that we actually attempt to apply a delay even in this case, per se this
>> condition recoveryApplyDelay(at)xlog(dot)c:
>> /* nothing to do if no delay configured */
>> if (recovery_min_apply_delay == 0)
>> return false;
>> Shouldn't we simply leave if recovery_min_apply_delay is lower 0, and not
>> only equal to 0?
>>
>
> Seems reasonable.
Trivial patch for master and REL9_4_STABLE attached as long as I don't
forget it..
--
Michael