Re: We have a requirement to downgrade from PostgreSQL 9.5.4 to 9.5.2

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: KGA Official <kga(dot)official(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: We have a requirement to downgrade from PostgreSQL 9.5.4 to 9.5.2
Date: 2016-09-20 06:51:42
Message-ID: CAB7nPqR1DtZrJO39L+9YjuA+M7RBQsROgjwZB-1CNxgEa_+ndw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:21 PM, KGA Official <kga(dot)official(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Regarding "are you really going to downgrade again"?
> The upgraded postgres will be bundled along with product code changes and
> other products. So, if someone finds product issues, they will roll back
> everything together.
> So, essentially, yes. One requirement of the roll out is that it be possible
> to roll-back.

Roll-out can be a complicated requirement knowing that sometimes minor
releases can introduce new GUC parameters and those can generate WAL
records. Though it is a rare fact, it is not impossible, and things
are kept compatible as much as possible. Personally I find deploying a
backup of PGDATA instead of reusing an existing PGDATA with older
binaries after it has run with newer binaries a more iron-solid
approach, and I've learnt to be careful with such things..
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PHANIKUMAR G 2016-09-20 08:27:54 postgres failed to start from services manager on windows 2008 r2
Previous Message KGA Official 2016-09-20 06:21:38 Re: We have a requirement to downgrade from PostgreSQL 9.5.4 to 9.5.2