Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
Date: 2017-11-30 01:26:00
Message-ID: CAB7nPqR0wCwZi5c=i5i0VSF+2po84VCPXJCg9cbCy+RG+ZT=fQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:02 PM, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Apart from this I have added few assert to keep eye on node->as_whichplan
> value in the attached patch, thanks.

This is still hot, moved to next CF.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2017-11-30 01:28:50 Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 01:25:00 Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries