From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)zoho(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc. |
Date: | 2015-12-04 05:32:33 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqR+k+absZU4ppXR_aQyWjG2HSv_jg3m+DdK8tnax-sPCw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I didn't push the changed for config_default you requested a few
>> messages upthread; it's not clear to me how setting it to undef affects
>> the whole thing. If setting it to undef makes the MSVC toolchain run
>> the tap tests in the default config, then I can do it; let's be clear
>> about what branch to backpatch this to. Also the "1;" at the end of
>> RewindTest.
>
>
> Setting it to undef will prevent the tests to run, per vcregress.pl:
> die "Tap tests not enabled in configuration"
> unless $config->{tap_tests};
> Also, setting it to undef will match the existing behavior on
> platforms where ./configure is used because the switch
> --enable-tap-tests needs to be used there. And I would believe that in
> most cases Windows environments are not going to have IPC::Run
> deployed.
>
> I have also rebased the recovery test suite as the attached, using the
> infrastructure that has been committed lately.
By the way, if there are no objections, I am going to mark this patch
as committed in the CF app. Putting in the infrastructure is already a
good step forward, and I will add an entry in next CF to track the
patch to add tests for recovery itself. Alvaro, what do you think?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-04 05:37:53 | Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2015-12-04 05:28:25 | Re: Confusing results with lateral references |