From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Enforce creation of destination folders for source files in pg_regress (Was: pg_regress writes into source tree) |
Date: | 2015-02-24 07:23:03 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqR+A-KEK7dD8QXQszXCWiAj4_88btn0GywBZzpDnE1EKA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 22, 2015, at 5:41 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > This is up to the maintainer of each extension to manage their code
> > tree. However I can imagine that some people would be grateful if we
> > allow them to not need sql/ and expected/ containing only one single
> > .gitignore file ignoring everything with "*", making the code tree of
> > their extensions cleaner.
>
> I don't see this as an improvement. What's wrong with a .gitignore file
> ignoring everything?
>
That's mainly a matter of code maintenance style (and I am on the side that
a minimum number of folders in a git tree makes things easier to follow),
and IMO it is strange to not have some flexibility. Btw, the reason why
this patch exists is this thread of last December:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20141212134508(dot)GT1768(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org#20141212134508(dot)GT1768@alvh.no-ip.org
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-02-24 08:06:02 | Re: improving speed of make check-world |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-02-24 07:03:41 | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |