Re: Bi-Directional replication client awareness

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Martin Gudmundsson <martingudmundsson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bi-Directional replication client awareness
Date: 2014-07-12 12:37:05
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQzvqF04=in4nGcSN=1mcBAJocKVwhP8PUg=rw5f+Pr3w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 07/12/2014 02:24 PM, Martin Gudmundsson wrote:
>> 12 jul 2014 kl. 04:58 skrev Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
>>> PgJDBC actually already supports rudimentary client-based failover.
>>
>> I've seen some mailing list threads regarding this but was that ever implemented? Do you know where it's documented?
>
> I don't think the patch ever got accompanying documentation.
> In case you're looking, the code was added by git
> bddc05f939ac9227b682e85d1ba0a9b902da814c .
The documentation has been added with this recent commit, two years
after the feature:
commit c78aa91c82610bd131697d0f4ed152d8017f476b
Author: Patrick Radtke <pradtke(at)stanford(dot)edu>
Date: Fri May 2 10:42:58 2014 -0700

Apply patch for failover documentation

The website is as well a bit outdated.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-07-12 12:48:02 Re: Bi-Directional replication client awareness
Previous Message Martin Gudmundsson 2014-07-12 12:37:02 Re: Bi-Directional replication client awareness