| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: expected/sequence_1.out obsolete? |
| Date: | 2014-10-21 22:15:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQxKSEYjJ+ha4BkWHhR8PgwawU3RK=09tOedCkxT3u-nA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> expected/sequence_1.out hasn't been updated at least since
>
> commit d90ced8bb22194cbb45f58beb0961251103aeff5
> Date: Thu Oct 3 16:17:18 2013 -0400
>
> and nobody appears to have complained.
>
> Can it be removed?
>
I don't think that this is a good idea, have a look at bb3f839 explaining
that this alternate output may happen when a checkpoint kicks in. Simple
patch is attached.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 20141021_regression_sequence.patch | text/x-patch | 1.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-10-21 22:19:01 | Re: Simplify calls of pg_class_aclcheck when multiple modes are used |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-10-21 22:10:54 | Re: expected/sequence_1.out obsolete? |