Re: [HACKERS] pg_basebackup --progress output for batch execution

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_basebackup --progress output for batch execution
Date: 2017-12-01 05:39:32
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQw_p6AbCejaR_61uMOiikbBMq=xQwwwrJVxGcz5C0O5Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Thank you very much for reviewing the patch and for your valuable
> input (you made me read the Microsoft Visual C specs ;))

+ if (!isatty(fileno(stderr)))
+ fprintf(stderr, "\n");
+ else
+ fprintf(stderr, "\r");
Er, why is that not "\r\n"?

I have moved this patch to next CF. Congrats for being the last one.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-12-01 05:42:55 Re: Commit fest 2017-11
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-12-01 05:34:34 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting