Release notes of 9.0~9.3 mentioning recovery_min_apply_delay incorrectly

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Release notes of 9.0~9.3 mentioning recovery_min_apply_delay incorrectly
Date: 2016-01-02 12:21:14
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQo+t41arMXQd+ycgOOamMc=ycKAGkEJSUzGhkdaZSHcA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi all,

While doing a git grep on recovery_min_apply_delay I noticed the following:
$ git grep recovery_min_apply -- *release*.sgml
src/sgml/release-9.0.sgml: that <varname>recovery_min_apply_delay</>
failed to delay application
src/sgml/release-9.1.sgml: that <varname>recovery_min_apply_delay</>
failed to delay application
src/sgml/release-9.2.sgml: that <varname>recovery_min_apply_delay</>
failed to delay application
src/sgml/release-9.3.sgml: that <varname>recovery_min_apply_delay</>
failed to delay application
src/sgml/release-9.4.sgml: Avoid busy-waiting with short
<literal>recovery_min_apply_delay</>

This is obviously incorrect because recovery_min_apply_delay has been only
introduced in 9.4. The culprit is visibly the commit message of 8049839 and
others that mentioned the parameter, though the patch applied does nothing
about it. Please see attached a patch to fix that.
Regards,
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
20160102_recovery_delay_releasenotes.patch text/x-patch 2.4 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-01-02 13:10:38 Re: Some 9.5beta2 backend processes not terminating properly?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-01-02 12:02:42 Re: pg_dump LOCK TABLE ONLY question