| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: replication commands and log_statements |
| Date: | 2014-08-20 04:14:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQjFY_Z0jgafsSbcqVpetHo_ywmcguwd6kBGqjEkdnQAw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > I think ideally it would have been better if we could have logged
> > replication commands under separate log_level, but as still there
> > is no consensus on extending log_statement and nobody is even
> > willing to pursue, it seems okay to go ahead and log these under
> > 'all' level.
>
> I think the consensus is clearly for a separate GUC.
>
+1.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2014-08-20 04:19:45 | Re: Hokey wrong versions of libpq in apt.postgresql.org |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2014-08-20 03:34:12 | Re: wrapping in extended mode doesn't work well with default pager |