Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command in PL block hitting Assert

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command in PL block hitting Assert
Date: 2013-04-24 06:32:54
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQj5=LvcoZCiyhhUqtLTigXKw4Ka07gnC9xEj8bAs+Prg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>wrote:

> On 2013-04-23 19:33:24 +0530, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Jeevan Chalke
> > > <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > Hi Tom,
> > > >
> > > > Since we are close to release, we should not have crashes like this.
> > >
> > > huh? we are not even in beta yet....
> > >
> >
> > I mean, beta release.
> >
> > BTW, as per Bruce's mail "we are planning to package 9.3
> > beta1 on *April 29*, with a release on May 2", we are close enough.
>
> The 2nd May date is for the release of packaged beta, not overall
> release unless I missed something major like months of testing ;)
>
Last year 9.2.0 was released at the beginning of September, so there would
be at least 4 months to test and improve 9.3 during beta assuming next
release is made on the same timeline.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2013-04-24 07:20:38 Re: Enabling Checksums
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-04-24 03:41:46 9.3 release notes suggestions