Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation
Date: 2014-12-08 00:47:42
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQiepY3Rj8y9kO5udy9-kW4eCLfKC_uVJ7vhVQtR6uoFw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Adam Brightwell (adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com) wrote:
>> > I don't see any changes to the regression test files, were they
>> > forgotten in the patch? I would think that at least the view definition
>> > changes would require updates to the regression tests, though perhaps
>> > nothing else.
>>
>> Hmmm... :-/ The regression tests that changed were in
>> 'src/test/regress/expected/rules.out' and should be near the bottom of the
>> patch.
>
> Hah, looked just like changes to the system_views, sorry for the
> confusion. :)
>
>> > Overall, I'm pretty happy with the patch and would suggest moving on to
>> > writing up the documentation changes to go along with the code changes.
>> > I'll continue to play around with it but it all seems pretty clean to
>> > me and will allow us to easily add the additiaonl role attributes being
>> > discussed.
>>
>> Sounds good. I'll start on those changes next.
This patch (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1616)
has not been updated in the commitfest app for two months, making its
progress hard to track. However, even if some progress has been made
things are still not complete (documentation, etc.). Opinions about
marking that as returned with feedback for the current commit fest and
create a new entry for the next CF if this work is going to be
pursued?
I guess that it would be fine simply move it to the next CF, but it
seems I cannot do that myself in the CF app.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-12-08 00:52:13 Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-12-08 00:39:04 Re: 9.5: Better memory accounting, towards memory-bounded HashAgg