From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Rebranding OS X as macOS |
Date: | 2016-09-24 23:19:37 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQiOM-eguS54JR-r5EkFg3zOdkURg65T2733=+vNUyf6A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Apple has decided to rename Mac OS X to "macOS", and apparently is now
> retroactively referring to old releases that way too. I propose that
> we should do likewise, ie run around and clean up our various references
> to "Mac OS X", "OS X", or "OSX" to uniformly say "macOS". I think it's
> considerably clearer to non-Apple people exactly what that is, plus
> there's not so much temptation towards variant spellings.
>
> We also have various uses of the ancient code name "Darwin". I think
> we should change that to "macOS" in user-facing docs, but I'm less
> inclined to do so in the code. In particular, renaming the template
> file or trying to change the PORTNAME value seems much too messy,
> so I think we should stick to "darwin" as the port name.
+1 to all that. I am seeing the same trend regarding the naming.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Enrique M | 2016-09-24 23:52:05 | Development build with uuid-ossp support - macOS |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-09-24 20:32:15 | Re: Better tracking of free space during SP-GiST index build |