From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: LSN as a recovery target |
Date: | 2016-09-04 03:50:21 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQfQSaFf6bk7LU-jnK15ZDHVvngYM+rOrgNWTj40MkZgg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 24 August 2016 at 05:50, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Everything else looks in good order.
>>
>> Committed. Thanks.
>
> Thanks for the commit!
By the way, what has been committed does not include the patch adding
the parsing context in case of an error as wanted upthread. Perhaps
that's not worth adding now as there is the GUC refactoring
potentially happening for the recovery parameters, so I don't mind
much. Just that's worth mentioning.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-09-04 04:18:23 | Re: autonomous transactions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-09-04 00:04:20 | Re: Transactional enum additions - was Re: Alter or rename enum value |