Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary
Date: 2016-11-09 02:08:30
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQbW3r0vAihqGXk8urOBsV3WKf52n4GsNT=CeyAWhHUSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, then it should be marked "Waiting on Author" or "Needs Review",
> not "Ready for Committer".
>
> Or maybe just "Returned with Feedback", if the reporter hasn't poked
> his head up for a few weeks.

Since yesterday with the help of Tsunakawa-san, we found a simple way
to test things by patching pg_ctl.c so "Ready for Committer"
definitely applies now. This has allowed us to draft patches that fix
the original issue as well as another issue we bumped on the way:
Postgres being started by the Local System user does not ensure that
it is a service. The instance may have been started by another service
expecting Postgres to report to stderr.

There is a refactoring patch that simplifies the code of
win32security.c for HEAD, as well as a simple back-patchable fix for
other branches.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-11-09 02:12:10 Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-11-09 01:53:51 Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary