| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little |
| Date: | 2016-03-12 22:43:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQ_f8sVE25t3hsSiB6Zj8RLT7ktFfhj3+jLPUfcFp-a=w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> This patch was reviewed during CF 2016-01 and has not been updated for
>> CF 2016-03. I think we should mark it Returned with Feedback.
>
> I have a full plate at the moment, Robert, both as a reviewer and as a
> patch author. This patch is basically uncontroversial, and is built to
> make the AM interface clearer, and the design of speculative insertion
> easier to understand. It's clear we should have it. I'll get around to
> revising it before too long.
Only one version of this patch has been sent at the beginning of this
thread, and Heikki has clearly expressed his disagreement about at
least a portion of it at the beginning of this thread, so I find it
hard to define it as an "uncontroversial" thing and something that is
clear to have as things stand. Seeing a new version soon would be a
good next step I guess.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-03-12 22:53:52 | Re: Refactoring speculative insertion with unique indexes a little |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-12 22:34:48 | Re: OS X 10.11.3, psql, bus error 10, 9.5.1 |