From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations |
Date: | 2017-09-25 11:22:44 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQY-4hdYF+W8OcMd7=B5DwgaLg6gB=vypnUR0fJA0d0_A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> FWIW, the same thing can happen when specifying an invalid replication
> origin name to pg_replication_origin_advance() and
> pg_replication_origin_progress(). These probably should fixed as well.
I have spawned a thread about that stuff three weeks ago:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQtPg%2BLKKtzdKN26judHcvPZ0s1gNigzOT4j8CYuuuBYg%40mail.gmail.com
With a patch registered where it should be:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/1290/
So I would suggest to keep the discussions about this problem in its own thread.
(Bonus: ALTER TABLE queries in parallel with multiple sessions and
enjoy the result)
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2017-09-25 11:25:55 | Re: proposal - Default namespaces for XPath expressions (PostgreSQL 11) |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2017-09-25 11:21:52 | Re: path toward faster partition pruning |