Re: [BUGS] Need guidance on regression.diffs

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Romu Hu <huruomu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Need guidance on regression.diffs
Date: 2014-10-29 02:25:20
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQV=uygLLfZai4=EXa7CAdRFmuTZ4aZPmTs4b7rgeoUpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-general

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Romu Hu <huruomu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I ran the test against an existing installation (redhat enterprise linux
> software collection postgresql92). The postgres server and the tests are
> from the same source package.
Well, your diffs are telling us the contrary. The additional columns
of \d+ have been added by this commit which is a new feature of
Postgres 9.4, introduced by this commit:

commit: 4168c00a5d9c0c0c17cdfc902587b6d22ea1720f
author: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:28:54 -0400
psql: conditionally display oids and replication identity

In psql \d+, display oids only when they exist, and display replication
identity only when it is non-default. Also document the defaults for
replication identity for system and non-system tables. Update
regression output.

So you may be indeed running the tests on a 9.2 server, but what is
sure is that you are comparing the results with the regression output
of a 9.4 server.
Regards,
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2014-10-29 02:35:15 Re: BUG #11811: Server segfault with many subpartitions when using nestloop
Previous Message Romu Hu 2014-10-29 01:44:23 Re: [GENERAL] Need guidance on regression.diffs

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-10-29 03:23:46 Re: [GENERAL] Need guidance on regression.diffs
Previous Message David G Johnston 2014-10-29 01:54:19 Re: Query optimization