From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Regression stoping PostgreSQL 9.4.13 if a walsender is running |
Date: | 2017-08-23 00:52:45 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQTqEwV9aHZqcr4QQ9p26bXQhyDvezXUFNpbxhECbSxJQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Marco Nenciarini
<marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it> wrote:
> I have noticed that after the 9.4.13 release PostgreSQL reliably fails
> to shutdown with smart and fast method if there is a running walsender.
>
> The postmaster continues waiting forever for the walsender termination.
>
> It works perfectly with all the other major releases.
Right. A similar issue has been reported yesterday:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA5_DuD0O1XyM8OnOzhRepyPU-t8nZKLzs1pT2JpzP0NS+vVNA@mail.gmail.com
Thanks for digging into the origin of the problem, I was lacking of
time yesterday to look at it.
> I bisected the issue to commit 1cdc0ab9c180222a94e1ea11402e728688ddc37d
>
> After some investigation I discovered that the instruction that sets
> got_SIGUSR2 was lost during the backpatch in the WalSndLastCycleHandler
> function.
That looks correct to me, only REL9_4_STABLE is impacted. This bug
breaks many use cases like failovers :(
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-08-23 01:59:40 | Re: Explicit relation name in VACUUM VERBOSE log |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-23 00:28:15 | obsolete code in pg_upgrade |