On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The part about the planning parameter looks good, thanks. The places
>> used to mention the databases used also makes more sense. Thanks for
>> your input.
>
> OK, committed and back-patched to 9.3.
Thanks.
--
Michael