Re: Backup throttling

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Backup throttling
Date: 2014-01-17 07:18:04
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQQcpaCgzAnJXeMvAExYp8r0D+mwE-ppLaP3D-Wqv1NPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> slightly related: we should start to reuse procLatch for walsenders
> instead of having a separate latch someday.
+ 1 on that.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KONDO Mitsumasa 2014-01-17 07:33:11 Re: drop duplicate buffers in OS
Previous Message Dave Chinner 2014-01-17 05:40:08 Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance