Re: Time to retire Windows XP buildfarm host?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time to retire Windows XP buildfarm host?
Date: 2016-12-23 23:15:04
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQQHBH=_=eRmdL4vGn3jzRfBSxYYRT1=5Dv1hc79Cvkdg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> ... and miraculously it has fixed itself.
>
> And it failed again today, once.
>
> Today I noticed that it's running gcc 4.5.0. But for the 4.5 branch,
> the GCC guys put out a few releases before abandoning it, and there are
> some compiler segmentation faults fixed in some of these releases,
> visible here:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&target_milestone=4.5.1
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&target_milestone=4.5.2
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&target_milestone=4.5.3
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&resolution=FIXED&target_milestone=4.5.4
>
> I think it'd be worthwhile to upgrade to the latest in that branch.

FWIW, I also saw segmentation faults with MinGW using gcc 4.8.1 in my
environments, after fetching the newest supported by the builds :(
Any configuration on Windows out of MSVC is depressing.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2016-12-23 23:23:23 Re: Remove lower limit on checkpoint_timeout?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-12-23 23:12:50 Re: Remove lower limit on checkpoint_timeout?