Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events
Date: 2017-08-09 06:42:25
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQOueeu0AFFfojFPGcpGzM5G0gTsz5b6ytB+f=buyyHVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Thread moved to -hackers.
>
> Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> > While at it, fix numerous other problems in the vicinity:
>
>> All of the above seem like good candidates for a checker script in
>> src/tools/check_XXX.pl, a bit like the others I've talked about
>> recently [1][2].
>
> Yeah, that's one idea, but I think it'd be better to have all these
> things be generated content from a single "wait_events.txt" file, like
> src/backend/utils/errcodes.txt which gives birth to a whole host of
> different files.

I would prefer that. Check scripts would tend to be never run. So is
there somebody willing to work on that? Or should I as I am
responsible to increasing the number of wait events?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2017-08-09 09:38:51 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix inadequacies in recently added wait events
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-08-09 01:32:19 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use MINVALUE/MAXVALUE instead of UNBOUNDED for range partition b

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-08-09 06:45:37 Re: Timing-sensitive case in src/test/recovery TAP tests
Previous Message Amit Langote 2017-08-09 05:49:49 Re: dubious error message from partition.c