From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Server ignores contents of SASLInitialResponse |
Date: | 2017-05-25 14:52:23 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQO9RijoeCYxY74v0eFq7jiLHWSy_eiidPqC1f1toFyfA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>> On 05/24/2017 11:33 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> I have noticed today that the server ignores completely the contents
>>> of SASLInitialResponse. ... Attached is a patch to fix the problem.
>>
>> Fixed, thanks!
>
> Thanks for the commit.
Actually, I don't think that we are completely done here. Using the
patch of upthread to enforce a failure on SASLInitialResponse, I see
that connecting without SSL causes the following error:
psql: FATAL: password authentication failed for user "mpaquier"
But connecting with SSL returns that:
psql: duplicate SASL authentication request
I have not looked at that in details yet, but it seems to me that we
should not take pg_SASL_init() twice in the scram authentication code
path in libpq for a single attempt.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sokolov Yura | 2017-05-25 15:12:44 | Re: Fix performance of generic atomics |
Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2017-05-25 14:52:14 | Re: Fix performance of generic atomics |