Re: psql: add \pset true/false

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com, Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, marko(at)joh(dot)to, daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql: add \pset true/false
Date: 2015-12-10 03:05:05
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQKhE0JCE1-WvGGM7kRv-oYOg420GSjM2bXSw_1NdSf7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
>> <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> At Sat, 5 Dec 2015 21:05:29 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAB7nPqSXcdM-5nFWDf8zuKmW8j_ooE6zYRqYQasp0fjKxKDX2A(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
>>> > Regarding the patch, I
>>> > would tend to think that we should just reject it and try to cruft
>>> > something that could be more pluggable if there is really a need.
>>> > Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Honestly saying, I feel similarly with you:p I personally will do
>>> something like the following for the original objective.
>>
>> Are there other opinions? The -1 team is in majority at the end of this thread..
>
> So, marking the patch as rejected? Any objections?

Done so. Alea jacta est, as one guy 2000 years ago would have said.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2015-12-10 03:29:36 Re: pg_hba_lookup function to get all matching pg_hba.conf entries
Previous Message Noah Misch 2015-12-10 02:54:53 Re: Re: In-core regression tests for replication, cascading, archiving, PITR, etc.