From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Manning <c(at)christophermanning(dot)org>, fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal to add --single-row to psql |
Date: | 2013-05-09 11:36:52 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQJvT3dfWr07F4y78q7ke-3vAeXmxvanoEwrsd8SXFq_w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:12 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:08:28PM -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > I believe that makes it significantly harder for them to actually
> > contribute code back that doesn't give them a business advantage, as
> > well as making it harder to justify hacking on the community
> > codebase because they'll just face a very large hurdle when it comes
> > to pulling that code back into their proprietary product.
> >
> > I don't know of any good way to solve that problem. Maybe it's not
> > worth solving... but I do suspect there's some useful stuff that the
> > community has lost out on because of this.
>
> Some of this is getting solved by making PostgreSQL more pluggable in
> ways that isolate the proprietary stuff, i.e. make people not have to
> touch the PostgreSQL core code much, if at all, in order to provide
> whatever special features they provide. Hooks and FDWs are two such
> pluggable components.
>
Extensions and the lovely background workers as well.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-05-09 11:45:44 | Re: Add regression tests for COLLATE |
Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2013-05-09 08:44:08 | Re: Fast promotion failure |