| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster |
| Date: | 2016-04-01 01:02:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQHoiUmH4dc_Psw5+29ftVyFGy1RLv=knsWsaYD2YWWzQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Noah Misch wrote:
>
>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Alvaro,
>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
>> item.
>
> That's correct. Since we already had a patch available, I pushed it.
> I'll wait for a few days before marking the open item as closed in the
> wiki, to make sure that hamster reports success a few times.
Thanks. I just did a couple of additional manual tests on hamster, and
the sporadic failure does not show up anymore, so the daily runs
should be in good shape now for this test.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-01 01:06:23 | Re: OOM in libpq and infinite loop with getCopyStart() |
| Previous Message | Karl O. Pinc | 2016-04-01 00:56:56 | PQsendQuery+PQgetResult+PQsetSingleRowMode limitations and support |