From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions |
Date: | 2016-01-30 12:36:27 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQFqOO5PUMMjS9xvT0hiw+8YTsTZzYZqKwOsqJYoogJTA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
> + /* overflow check (needed for INT64_MIN) */
> + if (lval != 0 && (*retval < 0 == lval < 0))
>
> Why not use "if (lval == INT64_MIN)" instead of this complicated condition?
> If it is really needed for some reason, I think that a comment could help.
Checking for PG_INT64_MIN only would be fine as well, so let's do so.
I thought honestly that we had better check if the result and the left
argument are not of the same sign, but well.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgbench-div-crash-v3.patch | text/x-diff | 1.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-01-30 12:37:45 | Re: Fwd: Core dump with nested CREATE TEMP TABLE |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-01-30 10:22:50 | Re: Template for commit messages |