Re: Reg: PostgreSQL Server "base/data" recovery

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Prajilal KP <prajilal(dot)kp(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reg: PostgreSQL Server "base/data" recovery
Date: 2015-03-19 11:24:01
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQEfA5Jw+BHswOob-8UuNixixAYxmkt2hu0sjHj=N9fmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Prajilal KP <prajilal(dot)kp(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I see, As there are many reasons exists for the data corruption i couldn't
> figure out it exactly.
> Unfortunately there is no backup for this system and is not possible to
> restore from the backup.

Well, then, lost data is lost.

> I have been using the NFS storage since 2013 and didn't experience this
> issue before, now i am afraid.
> We haven't set to run the fysnc() in our environment.
>
> If i set "fysnc to on" now, did it make any impact to current flow?

Having fsync = off in postgresql.conf is a perfect method to corrupt
your data, you should really not set it to off.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Prajilal KP 2015-03-19 11:30:51 Re: Reg: PostgreSQL Server "base/data" recovery
Previous Message Prajilal KP 2015-03-19 11:12:27 Re: Reg: PostgreSQL Server "base/data" recovery