Re: WAL's listing in pg_xlog by some sql query

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Sameer Kumar <sameer(dot)kumar(at)ashnik(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alex Ignatov <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL's listing in pg_xlog by some sql query
Date: 2016-06-06 02:24:19
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQBqe3E+fbEyN0Ay7LtxZ+Z=vkK6fnJ=JXUM=ia72UEwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> On 03/06/16 04:32, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> pg_ls_dir() has a check on superuser() embedded in its code.
>
> So what? That's what SECURITY DEFINER is all about.

Yes you are right. I missed completely the point :)
Thanks for the reminder and the correctness.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2016-06-06 07:54:31 Re: Replication
Previous Message Dmitry Igrishin 2016-06-05 17:40:44 Re: RowDescription via the SQL?