From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Everaldo Canuto <everaldo(dot)canuto(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit |
Date: | 2017-12-08 10:10:34 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQBjTpBm1x6rQNaEUCvWh7OfMVRfEzCv6TvuGZLX6iVzA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Everaldo Canuto
<everaldo(dot)canuto(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> For people already know psql nothing is changed, we will just have a hidden
> way to exit.
>
> I just think that if it don't change or break anything for usual psql user
> but also help some new comers, then is good.
>
> And remember, mysql client implement "\q" and "\quit" just to be more
> friendly to psql users. Lets us be friendly too ;-)
I think that you are going to need better reasons than just being more
friendly with other database clients by breaking a rule which is
around for 20 years. For one, it seems to me that your patch is
breaking multi-line SQL support with psql, as "quit" or "exit" are
legit SQL object names.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-12-08 10:11:58 | Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com |
Previous Message | Everaldo Canuto | 2017-12-08 10:06:14 | Re: proposal: alternative psql commands quit and exit |