Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Date: 2017-11-30 02:10:26
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQAa0YPqacRBkhcVKNkNPVj7haJMKW3eYHhnOuYDhM3Bg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com]
>> This patch does not apply, and did not get any reviews. So I am moving it
>> to next CF with waiting on author as status. Please provide a rebased version.
>> Tsunakawa-san, you are listed as a reviewer of this patch. If you are not
>> planning to look at it anymore, you may want to remove your name from the
>> related CF entry https://commitfest.postgresql.org/16/1150/.
>
> Sorry, but I'm planning to review this next month because this proposal could alleviate some problem we faced.

No problem. Thanks for the update.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 02:15:02 Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 02:09:14 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum WIP