From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump with tables created in schemas created by extensions |
Date: | 2016-08-25 00:34:53 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQ9YeffQ3L9PYDRnA1EApk1_22d-fa43sVF7ao8af=EPA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> The patch attached includes all those tests and they are failing. We
>> are going to need a patch able to pass all that, and even for master
>> this is going to need more thoughts, and let's focus on HEAD/9.6
>> first.
>
> Are you sure you have the tests correct..? At least for testagg(), it
> looks like you're testing for:
>
> GRANT ALL ON FUNCTION test_agg(int2) TO regress_dump_test_role;
>
> but what's in the dump is (equivilantly):
>
> GRANT ALL ON FUNCTION test_agg(smallint) TO regress_dump_test_role;
>
> I've not looked into all the failures, but at least this one seems like
> an issue in the test, not an issue in pg_dump.
Yes, you are right. If I look at the diffs this morning I am seeing
the ACLs being dumped for this aggregate. So we could just fix the
test and be done with it. I did not imagine the index issue though,
and this is broken for some time, so that's not exclusive to 9.6 :)
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-08-25 01:22:07 | Re: Stopping logical replication protocol |
Previous Message | Tsunakawa, Takayuki | 2016-08-25 00:30:58 | Re: pg_stat_lwlock wait time view |