From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Venkata Balaji N <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga(at)uptime(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <mpaquier(at)vmware(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pg_rewind in contrib |
Date: | 2015-03-26 04:32:31 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQ6t4ayasnR=-tf8G-aD4hj=UxzaSO-TS=+9_xhWbHOdA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Venkata Balaji N <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Test 1 :
>
> [...]
>
> If the master is crashed or killed abruptly, it may not be possible to do a
> rewind. Is my understanding correct ?
Yep. This is mentioned in the documentation:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/app-pgrewind.html
"The target server must shut down cleanly before running pg_rewind".
> Test 2 :
>
> - On a successfully running streaming replication with one master and one
> slave, i did a clean shutdown of master
> - promoted slave
> - performed some operations (data changes) on newly promoted slave and did a
> clean shutdown
> - Executed pg_rewind on the old master to sync with the latest changes on
> new master. I got the below message
>
> The servers diverged at WAL position 0/A2000098 on timeline 1.
> No rewind required.
>
> I am not getting this too.
In this case the master WAL visibly did not diverge from the slave WAL
line. A rewind is done if the master touches new relation pages after
the standby has been promoted, and before the master is shutdown.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-03-26 05:46:24 | Re: proposal: plpgsql - Assert statement |
Previous Message | Venkata Balaji N | 2015-03-26 03:23:10 | Re: pg_rewind in contrib |