Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Date: 2014-05-10 23:24:57
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ2-MbwG9QfHSRUebwxCp4u2i0iaqxtUKRU+QFgY-ux4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Anyway. I accept it's too late for beta1 now. Let's commit it if there's
> another catversion bump.
+1. Let's rely on the experience of senior committers here.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-05-11 00:25:49 Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2014-05-10 23:23:05 Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses