Re: [BUGS] Improper const-evaluation of HAVING with grouping sets and subquery pullup

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Improper const-evaluation of HAVING with grouping sets and subquery pullup
Date: 2017-11-29 05:08:05
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ0w228xyjCUg0zPM0eHVNApUXmxtx1RQ4w+XPZUrgTnQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Given that this is such a weird corner case, and we've not heard
> complaints from actual users about it, I'm inclined just to apply
> the patch in 9.6 and up and call it good.

Tom, are you planning to finish wrapping up this one? For now I am
moving it to next CF.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Gierth 2017-11-29 06:44:41 Re: [BUGS] Improper const-evaluation of HAVING with grouping sets and subquery pullup
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-29 04:57:48 Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)?