Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add transforms feature

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add transforms feature
Date: 2015-04-29 04:47:21
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ+=1O8FDSWoMjc8GU3Dfqqm9HDhAf0Ye=Xp01aukr=mQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On 4/28/15 4:10 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> Do we actually have a Windows machine building with Python3?
>>
>>
>> The answer seems to be "probably not". When I tried enabling this with
>> bowerbird I got a ton of errors like these:
>>
>> plpy_cursorobject.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
>> PyObject_SelfIter [C:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql\plpython3.vcxproj]
>> plpy_cursorobject.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
>> __imp_PyType_Ready referenced in function PLy_cursor_init_type
>> [C:\prog\bf\root\HEAD\pgsql\plpython3.vcxproj]
>>
>>
>> Something else to fix I guess.
>
> I think at least at one point the community Windows binaries built by
> EnterpriseDB were built against Python 3 (which upset some users). But
> they might not be using the msvc toolchain.

Er, aren't you simply trying to link with 32b libraries while building
in a 64b environment? I am able to make the build work with python 3.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-04-29 12:01:36 Re: shared_libperl, shared_libpython
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-04-29 03:48:20 Re: shared_libperl, shared_libpython

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2015-04-29 06:10:10 Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-04-29 04:30:58 Re: BUG #13126: table constraint loses its comment